Lack of mussolini

Nothing can be studied by those who cannot study the properties of things. How many of you can study things with out the knowledge of its properties? What is that which can be studied without the knowledge of its properties? Could you name that which can be studied without the knowledge of its properties?

I pose this question because I am under the impression the money greedy academic people is misguiding the public. There should be some civilized discussion on the current issue.
Education is supposed to improve the human living condition by promoting cooperation in human kind. Ironically the educational system promotes ruthless competition among the people. Can competition and cooperation go together.
Currently, there is another team of people who are proposing for the dissolution of educational systems.
What is your opinion?

common sense

That is one hell of a list, I’ll give you that. You get an “A” for thorough examples but an “F” for scientific method. I write this not to be mean but instructive rather than flippant, as others in the forum sometimes tend to be. All of those great examples of human study you listed constitute not the end result of scientific method but the never-ending pursuit of knowledge of every field of human interest through that tool. That is why all of your questions are nonsensical: not one of them can be known through the greatest thinking of anyone — Einstein, you or me.

Scientific method, which tries to eliminate the natural biases and prejudices of the person who has come up with a hypothesis and then attempts to prove it through the elimination of known misconceptions, has four steps:

1. Attempting to observe and describe a singular event or field of knowledge.
2. Forming a rational theory to explain the phenomena.
3. Using the carefully formed hypothesis to predict outcomes.
4. Having the original “proof” concluded through experimentation verified by independent scientists using their own, proper methods.

Only after multiple duplication of the original hypothesis by many other talented, knowledgeable scientists is it even possible that the theory might become known as a rule or law of nature; any doubts, and the theory remains just that — a good idea.

So far, that’s the best system of advancing human knowledge we have. An idea may start with one person or even be considered “common sense,” a term that is so off-the-mark as to be considered a joke among scholars. Good sense is anything but common.

Common special

It is very common for the special people to tell lies, especially those involved in public services common tell lies

The fundamental law

All things irrespective of the differences among them can be studied with the same knowledge because all of them have the properties of being a thing.

We can do medical testing for humans on fruit flies or yeast as starting points and still get results. How can this be possible if things have no common property?

We can do medical testing for humans on fruit flies or yeast as starting points and still get results. How can this be possible if things have no common property?

We are where we are …

These represent just the first stage of our cognitive methodologies to find similarities and disparities amongst various objects. We are where we are because of the higher stage that comprises generalizations obtained through analysis and synthesis.

We cannot know about that which has no property.

No knowledge is possible about the things which do not have at least one property that is true of it. That which has no property does not exist.

If there is no property that is true about x, then ~(x exists).
There is at least one property which is true of x, means, x exists.
(x exists) <-> EF(Fx).
~(x exist) <-> ~EF(Fx).
We cannot know about that which has no property.

Aren’t your activities limited by the properties of things?

• People/things cannot be divided if they do not have divisibility.
• People/things cannot be compared if they do not have comparability.
• People/things cannot be connected if they do not have connectivity.
• People/things cannot be disturbed if they do not have disturbability.
• People/things cannot be reordered if they do not have reorderability.
• People/things cannot be substituted if they do not have substitutability.
• People/things cannot be satisfied if they do not have satisfiability.

Aren’t your activities limited by the properties of things?

Sivashanmugam’s Inclusion Principle (SIP)

Sivashanmugam’s Inclusion Principle (SIP) states that no two things can be without a common property.

Everyone who cannot identify the common properties of different things will lack common sense. The common properties allow the effective functioning of common sense. Going by the definition of common, being able to predict a future reaction based on well-known behavior of something (a property), is common sense. It’s not an individual preference…because then it wouldn’t be common.

We cannot distinguish each other as human if no property is common to us! What properties are common to everyone and everything?

Every scientific method is a structured process whose logical structure is based on the knowledge of the common properties observed of different familiar things. What study is not structured? Does no principle govern science? Research is the search to find whether the property identified through a one is common to all or not! What is the difference between a thing and its properties?

Do people need special intelligence to study the common properties of things?

People do not need special intelligence to study the common properties of things. Idiots may need special intelligence to study the common properties of things. Is your intellect inferior to the intellect of your fellow human beings who routinely study divisibility, comparability, connectivity, disturbability, reorderability, substitutability, and satisfiability of things?